SC GOP primary before and after

Debating prowess doesn't matter if you don't try to win the debate

Charles Lewis

On the night before "Cris-rich":

Comment on the likes of Don Wildmon, Sarah Palin, Bobby Harrell et al endorsing Gingrich: now we clearly know who our friends are (and who, in contrast, is just as phony as Newt):

He's demonstrated time and again that he's not on our side

Especially, his first round forfeit at the hands of "Lurch" Kerry in a supposed "debate" on manmade global warming (at a time when the evidence was already overwhelming on our side and therefore he should have mopped the floor with Kerry - especially considering Newt's undeniably super sharp intellect) proved once and for all Newt's a world class pseudocon (always watch what a purported conservative does when he has a chance to actually make a difference).

In nominating Newt Gingrich (and his campaign confirms this in spades) we are ignoring all the ammunition he gives the Democrats and banking on his superior debating skills (and the fact that truth is overwhelmingly on our side) to overcome it all vs Obama.  But he had all that going into the global warming debate against Kerry and he lost - by out-and-out forfeit.  Fool me once, shame on you; twice, shame on me: are we willing to risk the future of American freedom and survivability on the chance that debate history won't repeat itself (as it generally does)?

It's clear that on eg big government, guns, bailouts, environmental tyranny, and health care mandates he's diametrically opposed to America's crucial interests.

His moral behavior, from Fannie Mae to familial faithlessness, should, in and of itself, cause any Christian leader to back off.

The only plausible (though clearly not worthy) excuse for such an endorsement would be the "he's electable (and not as far left as Romney)" rational.  But that's not in play here, since Rick Santorum, whose evident consevative and Christian credentials are far more credible than Gingrich's, is in the race.  In the two states in play so far, Santorum won Iowa and outpolled Newt in New Hampshire (and he even led Newt in South Carolina till these charlatans started lavushinging spurious endorsements on Gingrich).  So electability doesn't give Gingrich a leg up here.

Even my original choice, Michele Bahmann, is drawing my contempt in this regard.  She supposedly is mulling whom to endorse, but has announced she won't name anyone till after SC.  This reticence favors Newt heavily, in that it implies she's considering someone besides the obvious Santorum; that someone couldn't be Paul, who's savaged her for her Christianity, or Romney, whom she's consistently battered. So the mystery candidate under consideration is obviously Gingrich.  Even if she comes out for Santorum, post-SC reality will most likely make it too late.

The morning after:

Newt Gingrich's attacks on Romney's Bain Capitol connections - from a thoroughly marxist perspective - inexorably defines him as being to the left of Mitt.  If you accept the obvious fact, then, that Romney is a socialist (which he most definitely is), then Newt must then be an ultra-socialist (as are, in effect, all the useful idiots in SC who voted for him).

A nominee Newt will not try to defeat his ideological identical (Obama), anymore than RINO McCain tried - or anymore than he himself tried to defeat John Kerry in a man-made global warming "debate" where, instead of accpeting Lurch's head on a platter, he conceded in his opening remarks, then went on tour with Pelosi and company promoting the hoax.  He'll be there just to ensure that no genuine candidate (one that would try to win) can occupy the ticket.

This is the harvest that we here in Greenville County, SC have reaped for unseating County GOP chairman Samuel Harms who'd provided for free a half mill in legal services trying to abolish open primaries (an unseating after which I publicly divorced myself from the party).  As a result of the party's dropping of the given suit, once again it was the Dems (who had no other primary to vote in - the GOP affair was the only game in town) who chose the Republican nominee. 

Naturally, they picked the one with absolutely no chance of defeating the sitting dictator - the one with all the infidelity baggage, the support of the individual mandate and global warming hysteria, etc and the history of conceding in debates where all the facts - plus his superior intellect - are on his side.  Democrats, you see, unlike the government indoctrination center-trained Republicans who disgraced themselves yesterday, are not idiots.

I aplogize to America on behalf of my county and urge everyone to work diligently to get Pastor Wiley Drake, Dr Laurie Roth, or whomever America's Party (http://aipnews.com/) endorses on the ballot in as many states as possible.

Caveat: no matter how large your state, do not circulate petitiions (empty or filled out) by mail, as USPS "lost" dozens of shipments of mine with who knows how many signatures in '08 when I tried to get the party - and Alan Keyes - on the SC ballot.

PS: Personal to Ron Paul: seeing as how you, prior to this fiasco of an election, tried to prevail upon Rick Santorum to withdraw and transfer his support to you, now that Santorum outpolled you (17%-13%), shouldn't you practice what you preach and step aside for him?  Y'all two's combined 30% at least would have eclipsed Romney.

Faux conservative groups leading us off cliff for Newt

by Charles Lewis

 

Tea Party Nation's Judson Phillips is now urging all partiers to support Newt Gingrich (et tu, Judson?).  Phillips thus joined The Patriot Post's Mark Alexander in outrageously giving Newt the highest grades (in Alexander's case, along with fellow phonies Rick Perry and Mitt Romney - all given 6's) among GOP candidates, while relegating Michele Bachmann to a 3.

 

How soon they "forget" how Newt betrayed us in collaborating with the likes of Billary, Kerry, Gore..

 

The best way to discern a snake in our midst is to see how he handles himself when victory is within reach.  The ones working for the enemy will go out of their way to, in the words of Phyllis Schlafly in A Choice, not an Echo, "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory."

 

Bush II did it when Jayna Davis and Democrat pol David Schippers virtually handed him the donkeys' manes on a silver platter re their behavior after OK City.  Bush sent them both packing.

 

This prompted me to, on a Judicial Watch show on the eve of the Iraq invasion, to predict correctly, that we'd find loads of WMD's, and cover them up.  It was too tantalizingly easy to prove the left ludicrously, dangerously wrong and rid ourselves of them.  Instead, Bush seemed to do everything he could to feed into the "truther" scenario, which led most Americans to believe the right had perpetrated 9/11 (to justify an Iraq invasion that needed no further justification than the absolute proof that Davis and Schippers had produced that Saddam was behind the destruction of the Murrah Building).

 

Which, in turn, led to our collectivist congress ('07) and marxist globalist dictator ('09).  There are no unintended consequences in national politics.  If it happens (and if it's bad), it was designed that way (PLEASE read http://lewislyspeaking.blogspot.com/2011/09/true-nature-of-lies.html, if you haven't already).

 

Newt's smoking gun was when he "debated" John Kerry on "man-made global warming."  He couldn't have had an easier task:

• The "hockey stick" graph scandal had destroyed the left's "scientific basis" for the claim,
• The East Anglia affair had exposed the degree of collusion through which the climate alarmists were consciously deceiving us.
• It was well established that the world had been cooling, not warming, for more than a decade,
• It had been revealed that for the years that the earth had in fact been warming, all of the planets in the solar system had heated proportionately,
• The document supposedly signed by all the top climate scientists declaring man-made global warming a done-deal, indisputable fact had turned out to be a fraud, with the listing of names (as supporters) of many practitioners who actually rejected the notion (and just happened to have participated in the study), and with very few of the "signees" actually qualified, professionally, to opine on the issue,
• Meanwhile, another document declaring the whole matter a fraud had been circulated - with the signatures of many thousands of genuine climate scientists,
• The founders of Greenpeace and The Weather Channel had been brave enough to declare the whole thing a scam,
• A group of eminent scientists, spanning the globe and representing the full gamut of sub-disciplines, had produced (in the UK) a thoroughly convincing debunking of "The Great Global Warming Swindle" (http://www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.co.uk/),
• A court in the self-same (and ultra-PC!) UK had forbidden Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" documentary to be  shown to school children there, without a disclaimer that advised it contained numerous lies,
• ...just for starters.

The famously sharp-witted Gingrich seemed to have a slam dunk in his sights.  With such a brilliant proponent on the dais, Kerry, without a leg to stand on (and with Americans suffering countless economic consequences of the implementation of laws grounded in the given junk science), was dead meat.  This could go a long way toward turning the tide of the general debate and rallying public sentiment for opening up America's super-abundant energy resources.

 

Which is precisely why I wasn't the least bit surprised when Newt waved the white flag in his opening remarks that evening.  And then joined Kerry and a coterie of leftwing America haters in a campaign promoting the big lie of man-induced global warming.  (I knew the real Newt Gingrich from his belly-flops in the '90's, and, unlike so many those who call themselves, "conservatives," somehow I hadn't forgotten.)  It was Gingrich's chance to score one big for our side.  Fuggettaboutit.

 

How many ways can I say this?

• Fool me once, shame on you, twice, shame on me.
• He who lies, steals, and he who steals, kills.
• Trust, once broken, is nearly impossible to restore.

To put one's faith in anyone who's brazenly betrayed us in the past is beyond folly.  It's wicked.

 

America is in virtual death throes.  This election is too critical to squander on an impostor.  And, par for the course, there's nobody to vote for.

 

Newt is nefarious.  Perry (Gardasil, just for instance) is pathetic.  Romney (closing down adoption agencies that didn't condemn children to be raised by sodomite perverts - and so much more) is ridiculous.  Paul (voting for out-of-the closet sodomites in the military, thereby in turn chasing out the cream of American youth - ad infinitum) is an affront the principles to which he feigns allegiance.

 

Jesus. take the wheel.