Palm Sunday, Good Friday, Tea, and OWS

by Charles Lewis

It used to be that one thing related to this Resurrection season had me utterly stumped.  How is it that on a Sunday the streets of Jerusalem were filled with a multitude passionately, even lavishly welcoming an Individual whom it recognized as its long awaited Messiah, only for the same streets to be overflowing, a few days later, with a horde demanding His execution, even choosing to spare a vicious criminal's life over His?  It simply didn't make sense, and the Bible didn't explicitly account for it.

But after observing, in recent months, the contrast between the actions of the various Tea Parties, 9/12 groups, etc. and those of Occupy Wall Street, ACORN, et al, I find it all falls into perfect place.  It's nothing more than the difference between the mentality of a multitude and that of a mob.  A distinction between individuals - in however huge a number - that have made conscious, rational decisions to serve good (and/or have been led by the power of divine grace) and a collective swarm manipulated by an outside, evil force.  It's a dynamic as real now as it's always been.  It's called human nature.

The Minutemen, the Patriots, the Green Mountain Boys, the original (Boston) tea party types, who, collectively, formed the foundation for the most free and moral culture the world was to know, were motivated by a higher, essentially spiritual, calling, just as were the countless believers who laid palm fronds at the feet of our Savior.  Not so with the French masses who stormed the Bastille. Their  legacy, unsurprisingly, has been one of nightmarish tyranny and bewildering instability.

I used to wonder what happened to the folks who'd celebrated Jesus's arrival - once the chips were down and His survival was at stake.  Why didn't they counter the mindless bloodlust of the rabble, fight fire with fire, as it were?  But then I've long wondered why our side can't get organized around a cause at the drop of a hat, the way the evildoers always seem to.  With no justification to speak of, they typically produce an army of ruffians seemingly willing to put their lives on the line making life unbearable for the rest of us.  With our people, even when our backs are to the wall (actually, especially with our backs to the wall) so much as a modest, meek quorum often seems virtually unattainable.

The explanations are manifold.  First, man's sinful nature makes him eminently controllable by evil, particularly when he assembles in large groups, which function as human herds.  The enemy is the ultimate expert at exploiting this.  The Sanhedrin were a first class example.  Orchestrating mob behavior toward an unholy agenda was what they did for a living.

Sanhedrin still function in our midst.  They call themselves "community organizers" nowadays.  They adhere to "rules for radicals," and their Machiavellian skills have been finely honed, with their subjects having been meticulously prepped by the government indoctrination center system.

The crowd calling for Christ's condemnation (and this is key) was made aware which side the powers-that-be's bread was buttered on and immediately fell in line, secure in the knowledge that there would be no consequences to pay.  As much now as in New Testament times as well Old, a people is destroyed for lack of knowledge, especially of Scripture.  I imagine quite a few became disenchanted (ignorant of Isaiah 53 and the need for the fulfillment of prophecy) when a vulnerable Yeshua allowed himself to be captured, scourged, and humiliated by His inferiors.  Without the grounding of Biblical truth, we, too, can become disillusioned at the dizzyingly rapid unfolding of ominous events.

The Bible isn't clear on the point, but I reckon that the Thursday and Friday fanatics weren't, at least for the most part, the same souls who'd hailed the Master's arrival the previous Sunday.  There were, perhaps, a few overlaps - much in the sense that some of my conservative colleagues have expressed a misguided affinity (in terms of a perceived common enemy?) for the occupier movement, but certainly these defectors included none who were truly led by the Holy Spirit.  And those righteous ones who might have been motivated to stand up for the Son of Man would have sustained the withering wrath of the Roman army and others, and they knew it.

The current analogy is stark.  OWT-ers know that the present regime approves of, encourages, and feeds off their anti-social actions, that they have nothing to fear from those one percenters presently in power.

This was made clear from practically day one, when the DOJ vacated an already consummated slam dunk against the New Black Panther Party vis a vis its brazen, armed intimidation tactics the prior Election Day in Philadelphia polling places.  (And it's continued unabated through the dearth of reaction to that same NBPP's recent, outrageously felonious advancement of a bounty on the head of a Florida Neighborhood Watch captain.)  The kid glove handling of the rampant crimes of the "occupee-ers" just reaffirms this state of affairs.

As for their patriot counterparts, such assurances are as far from reality as one can get.  The tea partiers are aware that even the slightest foray into occupier-type behavior would be met - with the media's complicity - with overwhelming force; they'd be summarily mowed down.

Mobs are governed by the collective mindset, whereas by definition the decision to serve God and His righteousness is an individual choice.  "Collective salvation," which President Obama so enthusiastically touts, is as much an oxymoron as "welfare rights," "property tax," or (and I know I'm going to lose some folks here) "Christian rock," whereas collective damnation is the way of the world.

The controlled chaos of the callers for crucifixion has been present in every country that has succumbed to Satanic communism and its various subsidiaries and surrogates.  The elite call these operatives "useful idiots."  Once the despots are in power, such "sheeple," rightly perceived as potential troublemakers, are the first to be eradicated, even before the entrepreneurs.

In the end, may I remind you, it is not our calling to overpower the enemy with street tactics.  What if the Sunday celebrants had risen up and overwhelmed the bloodthirsty Thursday throng and prevented the crucifixion?  No Lamb of God, no atonement, no salvation.  There is, likewise, prophecy that must be fulfilled in these times, much of it downright disturbing.  It is our calling, however, to remain faithful, to seek His guidance, and to tell the truth.

God still has a plan for His flock.  The absolute futility of our capacity as humans has always been lesson one.  He Who sees the end from the beginning will not forsake those who persevere to the end.  May I wish a serene, hopeful, and Spirit-filled Resurrection Sunday to all my brethren.

Add Club G cocktails to anti-US crimmigrant mix

by Charles Lewis

 

I've argued to y'all and many others the point that the 50 million-plus (a reasonable estimate) criminal aliens in America despise this nation with a passion.  That's been my experience in virtually every contact I've had with them (and - being a Spanish & Portuguese speaker with a Brazilian wife - I've had many), and I've cited a plethora of more public evidence as well.

 

On of my standard examples involves what our national soccer team must face when it goes up against a foreign team - particularly a Latin one - in stadia in this country.  I've recounted how crimmigrants pack those venues and boo our national anthem, boo every move of the American players (many of whom themselves are Latinos - race, you see, doesn't matter; it's a matter of anti-American hatred), even boo our boys when they lose and accept the runners-up trophy.

 

I've made the point that these are the anti-Americans to whom our country is being handed over, and I've drawn the obvious conclusion that it's national suicide.  But now it comes out that I grossly understated the situation and need to publish a correction.

 

To wit: what I left out (because our treasonous media cover it up) is that our players are also routinely pelted with the kind of mixture conventionally concocted by guests (er, inmates?) at Club Gitmo and hurled at their servants (er, guards?).

 

American players, in short, are doused with urine and vomit.

 

The high irony here is that this news comes in the context of the report from San Antonio that when, after clinching a basketball game, the fans of a high school team broke into the well-known "USA" chant, were swiftly silenced by their team's coach (I say he should lose his job for that act), and are to be reprimanded, punished, and forced to apologize for their expression of patriotism.

 

You see, the authorities (everyone from the administrators of the given government indoctrination center to the local school board) apparent fear that the illegal aliens among the crowd might be offended by the positive reference to America, and might commit mayhem accordingly (although one wonders if they can pee and vomit on cue to that extent).

 

So patriotism is verboten and disgusting body fluid attacks on Americans by crimmigrants is considered benign, not newsworthy, even justified.  To paraphrase G Gordon Liddy, when I was a kid this used to be a country.

SC GOP primary before and after

Debating prowess doesn't matter if you don't try to win the debate

Charles Lewis

On the night before "Cris-rich":

Comment on the likes of Don Wildmon, Sarah Palin, Bobby Harrell et al endorsing Gingrich: now we clearly know who our friends are (and who, in contrast, is just as phony as Newt):

He's demonstrated time and again that he's not on our side

Especially, his first round forfeit at the hands of "Lurch" Kerry in a supposed "debate" on manmade global warming (at a time when the evidence was already overwhelming on our side and therefore he should have mopped the floor with Kerry - especially considering Newt's undeniably super sharp intellect) proved once and for all Newt's a world class pseudocon (always watch what a purported conservative does when he has a chance to actually make a difference).

In nominating Newt Gingrich (and his campaign confirms this in spades) we are ignoring all the ammunition he gives the Democrats and banking on his superior debating skills (and the fact that truth is overwhelmingly on our side) to overcome it all vs Obama.  But he had all that going into the global warming debate against Kerry and he lost - by out-and-out forfeit.  Fool me once, shame on you; twice, shame on me: are we willing to risk the future of American freedom and survivability on the chance that debate history won't repeat itself (as it generally does)?

It's clear that on eg big government, guns, bailouts, environmental tyranny, and health care mandates he's diametrically opposed to America's crucial interests.

His moral behavior, from Fannie Mae to familial faithlessness, should, in and of itself, cause any Christian leader to back off.

The only plausible (though clearly not worthy) excuse for such an endorsement would be the "he's electable (and not as far left as Romney)" rational.  But that's not in play here, since Rick Santorum, whose evident consevative and Christian credentials are far more credible than Gingrich's, is in the race.  In the two states in play so far, Santorum won Iowa and outpolled Newt in New Hampshire (and he even led Newt in South Carolina till these charlatans started lavushinging spurious endorsements on Gingrich).  So electability doesn't give Gingrich a leg up here.

Even my original choice, Michele Bahmann, is drawing my contempt in this regard.  She supposedly is mulling whom to endorse, but has announced she won't name anyone till after SC.  This reticence favors Newt heavily, in that it implies she's considering someone besides the obvious Santorum; that someone couldn't be Paul, who's savaged her for her Christianity, or Romney, whom she's consistently battered. So the mystery candidate under consideration is obviously Gingrich.  Even if she comes out for Santorum, post-SC reality will most likely make it too late.

The morning after:

Newt Gingrich's attacks on Romney's Bain Capitol connections - from a thoroughly marxist perspective - inexorably defines him as being to the left of Mitt.  If you accept the obvious fact, then, that Romney is a socialist (which he most definitely is), then Newt must then be an ultra-socialist (as are, in effect, all the useful idiots in SC who voted for him).

A nominee Newt will not try to defeat his ideological identical (Obama), anymore than RINO McCain tried - or anymore than he himself tried to defeat John Kerry in a man-made global warming "debate" where, instead of accpeting Lurch's head on a platter, he conceded in his opening remarks, then went on tour with Pelosi and company promoting the hoax.  He'll be there just to ensure that no genuine candidate (one that would try to win) can occupy the ticket.

This is the harvest that we here in Greenville County, SC have reaped for unseating County GOP chairman Samuel Harms who'd provided for free a half mill in legal services trying to abolish open primaries (an unseating after which I publicly divorced myself from the party).  As a result of the party's dropping of the given suit, once again it was the Dems (who had no other primary to vote in - the GOP affair was the only game in town) who chose the Republican nominee. 

Naturally, they picked the one with absolutely no chance of defeating the sitting dictator - the one with all the infidelity baggage, the support of the individual mandate and global warming hysteria, etc and the history of conceding in debates where all the facts - plus his superior intellect - are on his side.  Democrats, you see, unlike the government indoctrination center-trained Republicans who disgraced themselves yesterday, are not idiots.

I aplogize to America on behalf of my county and urge everyone to work diligently to get Pastor Wiley Drake, Dr Laurie Roth, or whomever America's Party (http://aipnews.com/) endorses on the ballot in as many states as possible.

Caveat: no matter how large your state, do not circulate petitiions (empty or filled out) by mail, as USPS "lost" dozens of shipments of mine with who knows how many signatures in '08 when I tried to get the party - and Alan Keyes - on the SC ballot.

PS: Personal to Ron Paul: seeing as how you, prior to this fiasco of an election, tried to prevail upon Rick Santorum to withdraw and transfer his support to you, now that Santorum outpolled you (17%-13%), shouldn't you practice what you preach and step aside for him?  Y'all two's combined 30% at least would have eclipsed Romney.

Paulista for Life

Ron Paul's refusal, in the most recent debate (in Iowa) to credit Justices Thomas, Scalia, et al with any moral or Constitutional superiority to Kagen, Sotomaior, Ginsberg, and Breyer (his "they're all good and they're all bad" reply makes Kerry's "I voted for the bill before I voted against it" seem forthright by comparison).  This may be the most significant tidbit yet on Paul.

Quite a few others have described a phenomenon I've encountered in my dealings with Paulistas (and in my observations of the curmudgeon himself):

If you don't march in lockstep with their views (to include military gay pride parades, "In God We Trust" off the money, "America got what she deserved on 9/11," legalized heroin and prostitution, ad nauseum), you're a brainwashed neocon propagandist.  Hence his recent smears of Bachmann and Santorum on Leno.

But you must notice that such a monolithic demand doesn't hold when it comes to leftists.  The SCOTUS response, for instance, actually elevates the Stalinist wing at the same time it demeans the originalists.  On Leno, while he lambasted the only two conservatives in the race, he had nothing malignant to spew on Romney, Gingrich, or Perry, and he actually praised lefty Huntsman, an Obama appointee with far more in common with "that one" than with the two Paul skewered.

And Paul had no problem endorsing the presidential candidacies of far, far leftists Ralph Nader and Sheila Jackson-Lee in '08.   Or lavishing accolades on collectivists like Dennis Kucinich and Chuck Hagel and co-sponsoring, with Barney Frank, a bill legalizing Intenet porn.  Meanwhile, an ex-COS for one of the few congressmen I've trusted on the Hill has long informed that if you've got a proposal that just might somehow bear fruit and would like Paul's support, you'd best not bother to apply if you're on the right.

Paul leads Iowa, a few days before the caucuses there, as of this writing, and he and Mitt Romney officially have Virginia to themselves, due to a bizarre new rule there.  His chances of winning the nomination (at which point the Obamites will beat him into the ground with his past marginally racist statements - along with his seemingly choreographed walk-off on CNN to avoid discussing them) are frighteningly real.

Many years ago, I heard a street evangelist affirm that homosexuals constitute the one class of sinner a member of which he's never seen repent; he didn't think one ever could.  The intervening years have disproven that conjecture, and my Save America Summit actually had a redeemed ex-gay serving ably.

The black hole, on the other hand, of Paulism appears to permit neither light nor adherents to escape.  Once initiated, one can no longer maintain ties to one's former Judeo-Christian-based principle set.  One embraces, in its place, a jealous god in the form of an America-demeaning, hybrid agenda, from the leftist component of which no deviation is allowed, while, for Marxists from Kagen to Kucinich, the rightist elements are fair game.

Ron Paul, a hard leftist out trolling for conservative souls.

Heaven help us.

US votes itself into perdition

by Charles Lewis

November 8, 2011.  Write that date down.  I can't tell you how much of an influence factors like Motor Voter, paperless (easily hackable Diebold) balllots, ACORN-style illegal activites, the New Black Panthers knowing they can intimidate with impunity, and simililar illicit aspects of ths now-banana-republic-style American electoral process contributed to the outcome.  Probably quite a bit.

Even so, the results of two "plebiscites" in America are jarring.  Particularly in view of the fragile condition of our way of life, under assault from all angles, and especially looking ahead to 2012, whose tallies will surely determine whether freedom and prosperity have any chance of existing here (and in the knowledge that God's blessings will be indispensable), the results are troubling.  But first the "good' news:

The voters in a referendum in what otherwise appears a stunningly liberalized Ohio demanded an exemption for the state from the hyper-socialistic centerpiece of the Obama administration, popularly known as ObamaCare.  The outcome will amount to nothing in the face of any unfavorable upcoming SCOTUS decision on the matter, but it does send a message.  I hope that similar measures appear on the touch screens of the thirty-five or so more conservative states in '12, that election fraud doesn't dampen the counts, and that the victorious party nationwide will be faced with an enormous mandate to cut the horrrendous program off at the knees.

And in Mississippi voters had the judgment to see through the lobbying of outgoing establishment RINO Governor Haley Barber and prohibited him from taking private land and bestowing it upon megacorps who'd pay higher taxes.  Kudos.

Now the bad news:

Mississippi voters (we're told) have contradicted what is now well established scientific fact, spat in the face of the clearly espressed will of God, and arbitrarily sentenced (in the long run) millions of innocent pre-borns to hideous execution, in rejecting an initiative that would have officially designated babies in the womb as what they are - people.  "Ole Miss" is the only state where such a topic has come within the reach of the electorate, and possibly the only one traditionalist enough that it could.  According to the report of the vote-counting cybersystem, the voters said no.

And back in Ohio, the voters are said to have, in effect, pronounced the death knell for public sector employment and foisted on the rest of us a second, Greece-like, California, when they defeated an appeal to bring government workers (who make about twice as much - in both salary and benefits - as their free enterprise-employed counterparts, and, famously, do little or no positive, productive work) a step or two closer to the real world.  A rejected ballot item would have ended, to an extent, the ludicrously conflicted-interest practice (even according to socialist prez FDR, BTW) of obligatory unionism (strikes and all) among that group.

Republican Governor John Kasich has been placed in an impossible catch-22.  He does not have the funds - under the Obamaconomy - to provide essential services, and is now denied even the distant prospect of narrowing the outrageously out-of-skew compensation gap between government and real workers.  That a hard working laborer in the capitalist world would vote to keep someone, employed in an identical capacity (though, doubtless, doing far less actual work, and, likely, plenty of harm) by Big Brother, earning twice as much money and bagging astronomically higher perks than the voter himself is testimony to the effectiveness of a mainstream media mendacious beyond belief, along with the world's worst (and conceivably its most nefarious) "school" system.

This will plunge a dagger into that state's private sector's ability to compete for talent with the leviathan.  Government will have to grow (and confiscate profits) to the extent where nearly everybody is either on the dole or working for either the government or some hideously acquiescent "public-private" entity.  And soon, enough people will find this "good life" preferable to actually producing something for a living that the government will be obliged to force people to work.

The United States of Pyonyang will have been birthed (which has been the method to our welfare-state madness for, lo, these many decades of Fabian socialism, regulatory recapture, Cloward/Pivinism, Alinskyism, compassionate conservatism - whatever euphemism you prefer to tag it with).  We're already seeing this in California, and in the demands of the Occupiers nationwide.

More than anything, this seems to mark the downfall of the Tea Party.  Perhaps even more alarming than yesterday's elections is a recent polll that shows nationwide support (in the low twenties) for that amalgam of hard working, generally Christian, patriots (who refrain from inflammatory rhetoric, eschew violence or even civil disobedience,, and leave their rally grounds cleaner than they were when the given rally began) lagging far behind backing (iin the low thirties) for the Occupydiots (who demand an end to capitalism, replaced by cradle-to-grave authoritarian totalitarianism, and have turned the streets of the nation into lawless, contaminated, burned out metrosexual rape zones).

With the economy in worse shape than ever, one would have thought that yesterday would have mirrored, even amplified, the gains of 2010.  It just shows that in an NEA-produced culture, the power of indoctrination and mind control is more of a factor than are common sense reality, the testimony of one's senses, or the overwhelming testimony of thousands of years of the history our kids are no longer taught.

Ya gotta hand it to them progressives.

May God preserve His remnant.

Faux conservative groups leading us off cliff for Newt

by Charles Lewis

 

Tea Party Nation's Judson Phillips is now urging all partiers to support Newt Gingrich (et tu, Judson?).  Phillips thus joined The Patriot Post's Mark Alexander in outrageously giving Newt the highest grades (in Alexander's case, along with fellow phonies Rick Perry and Mitt Romney - all given 6's) among GOP candidates, while relegating Michele Bachmann to a 3.

 

How soon they "forget" how Newt betrayed us in collaborating with the likes of Billary, Kerry, Gore..

 

The best way to discern a snake in our midst is to see how he handles himself when victory is within reach.  The ones working for the enemy will go out of their way to, in the words of Phyllis Schlafly in A Choice, not an Echo, "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory."

 

Bush II did it when Jayna Davis and Democrat pol David Schippers virtually handed him the donkeys' manes on a silver platter re their behavior after OK City.  Bush sent them both packing.

 

This prompted me to, on a Judicial Watch show on the eve of the Iraq invasion, to predict correctly, that we'd find loads of WMD's, and cover them up.  It was too tantalizingly easy to prove the left ludicrously, dangerously wrong and rid ourselves of them.  Instead, Bush seemed to do everything he could to feed into the "truther" scenario, which led most Americans to believe the right had perpetrated 9/11 (to justify an Iraq invasion that needed no further justification than the absolute proof that Davis and Schippers had produced that Saddam was behind the destruction of the Murrah Building).

 

Which, in turn, led to our collectivist congress ('07) and marxist globalist dictator ('09).  There are no unintended consequences in national politics.  If it happens (and if it's bad), it was designed that way (PLEASE read http://lewislyspeaking.blogspot.com/2011/09/true-nature-of-lies.html, if you haven't already).

 

Newt's smoking gun was when he "debated" John Kerry on "man-made global warming."  He couldn't have had an easier task:

• The "hockey stick" graph scandal had destroyed the left's "scientific basis" for the claim,
• The East Anglia affair had exposed the degree of collusion through which the climate alarmists were consciously deceiving us.
• It was well established that the world had been cooling, not warming, for more than a decade,
• It had been revealed that for the years that the earth had in fact been warming, all of the planets in the solar system had heated proportionately,
• The document supposedly signed by all the top climate scientists declaring man-made global warming a done-deal, indisputable fact had turned out to be a fraud, with the listing of names (as supporters) of many practitioners who actually rejected the notion (and just happened to have participated in the study), and with very few of the "signees" actually qualified, professionally, to opine on the issue,
• Meanwhile, another document declaring the whole matter a fraud had been circulated - with the signatures of many thousands of genuine climate scientists,
• The founders of Greenpeace and The Weather Channel had been brave enough to declare the whole thing a scam,
• A group of eminent scientists, spanning the globe and representing the full gamut of sub-disciplines, had produced (in the UK) a thoroughly convincing debunking of "The Great Global Warming Swindle" (http://www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.co.uk/),
• A court in the self-same (and ultra-PC!) UK had forbidden Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" documentary to be  shown to school children there, without a disclaimer that advised it contained numerous lies,
• ...just for starters.

The famously sharp-witted Gingrich seemed to have a slam dunk in his sights.  With such a brilliant proponent on the dais, Kerry, without a leg to stand on (and with Americans suffering countless economic consequences of the implementation of laws grounded in the given junk science), was dead meat.  This could go a long way toward turning the tide of the general debate and rallying public sentiment for opening up America's super-abundant energy resources.

 

Which is precisely why I wasn't the least bit surprised when Newt waved the white flag in his opening remarks that evening.  And then joined Kerry and a coterie of leftwing America haters in a campaign promoting the big lie of man-induced global warming.  (I knew the real Newt Gingrich from his belly-flops in the '90's, and, unlike so many those who call themselves, "conservatives," somehow I hadn't forgotten.)  It was Gingrich's chance to score one big for our side.  Fuggettaboutit.

 

How many ways can I say this?

• Fool me once, shame on you, twice, shame on me.
• He who lies, steals, and he who steals, kills.
• Trust, once broken, is nearly impossible to restore.

To put one's faith in anyone who's brazenly betrayed us in the past is beyond folly.  It's wicked.

 

America is in virtual death throes.  This election is too critical to squander on an impostor.  And, par for the course, there's nobody to vote for.

 

Newt is nefarious.  Perry (Gardasil, just for instance) is pathetic.  Romney (closing down adoption agencies that didn't condemn children to be raised by sodomite perverts - and so much more) is ridiculous.  Paul (voting for out-of-the closet sodomites in the military, thereby in turn chasing out the cream of American youth - ad infinitum) is an affront the principles to which he feigns allegiance.

 

Jesus. take the wheel.

Baal worship and Paul worship

by Charles Lewis

 

http://lewislyspeaking.blogspot.com/2011/10/baal-worship-and-paul-worship.html

http://elusivetruth.blogtownhall.com/

 

Just a note on the "Value Voters Summit" just concluded in Washington:

 

One of the participants had said in a recent debate that he's just fine with states that want to legalize drugs - not just grass, but right on through heroin.

 

He sponsored a bill - in concert with DC's most prominent sodomite whoremonger harborer - to legalize porn on the web.

 

He voted to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and thus hand our military over to a brigade of "flaming faggots" with their oppressive agenda, with horrific sensitivity training, muzzling of our chaplains, who will force our best and brightest to shower with, and sleep next to, perverts who openly ogle them, subject the most moral and effective fighting force in history to politically correct harassment and demonization, run our heroes out of the service to be replaced by ACORN-like brownshirt-style operatives who'll relish the notion of turning their weapons on patriots and Christians here at home, and force a re-institution of the draft.

 

He's proudly posed for pics with pimps from perverse places like Primm & Pahrump.

 

I heard him proclaim his favorite fellow Republican candidate as supeRINO Chuck Hagel and his preferred Dem, mega-marxist Dennis Kucinich.

 

The ACLU has given him as high as a 67% rating.

 

He opposes a federal ban on abortion.

 

He echoes Rosie O'Donnell and Ward Churchill in blaming America (for offering even token resistance to global terrorislam) for 9/11, and equating that atrocity to what we'd feel like doing if China were to occupy us.

 

He's proposing to impeach Obama - not for the thousands of ultra-impeachable offenses he continues to commit toward the destruction of America and her Constitution, but for killing the leading pretender to the throne of the BinLaden empire, a Yemeni with "birthright" citizenship who openly advocated for our massacre.

 

He's slammed our freedom-loving allies, from Taiwan to Colombia to the former eastern bloc nations, while advocating for virtually chummy relations with satanic enemies from Vietnam to Cuba to Iran.

 

In an '08 Value Voters debate (source: heroic Chaplain Gordon Klingenschmitt), he served up a whopping eight (8) of the twelve un-Biblical answers given by all the participants combined.

 

He and his loyal surrogates have thrice undercut and derailed the most Christian of prez candidates: a redhot Tom Tancredo in the '08 GOP race, Constitution Party online poll winner (in a rout) Alan Keyes later that year, and one-time Repuiblican frontrunner Michele Bachmann this time around.

 

The ungodly Howard Stern, unsurprisingly, has endorsed him.

 

He stridently espouses throwing Israel under the bus.

 

He's RonPaul, and he just won the DC Value Voters straw poll by a whopping 13% over his nearest competition.

 

If this is the best patriotic Christian conservatives can do, I no longer feel comfortable even beseeching our God for mercy on America.

 

All I can do is implore that those readers who still love God and country forward this e-mail far and wide, and stand up against this heinous monster that's hijacked the righteous movement, destroying all earthly hope here, and turned countless conservatives into mindless, soul-less liberals, and that causes erstwhile patriots to lip-sync as he continues to spout his litany of leftwing talking points.

 

Prayerfully asking the Creator to do what He's gotta do,

 

Charles Lewis

• Follow-up:  a little tidbit came in about the true nature of RonPaul's resounding "victory" in the recent Value Voters Summit (DC) straw poll: 600 "ringers" were brought in special for that vote at the end of the event; they'd witnessed NONE of the speeches, including Paul's.  (Indications are that Cain - who took 2nd place in the poll by a huge margin over the remaining candidates - was the true winner, in terms of inspirational oratory.)

This does not surprise me in the least, as over the years I've witnessed, on numerous debate broadcasts, audiences apparently going wild over characteristic leftwing comment after characteristic leftwing comment spewing from the mouth of this manchurian madman with the method to the madness.  (That included this cycle's initial debate here in upstate SC, where I know for a fact the vast majority of conservatives have no stomach for that type of posturing.)

 

I have to wonder how many of these professional itinerant groupies really are supporters of the package of Constitutionalist policy positions Paul uses to gain people's confidence and lure them away from their righteousness like the antichrist I truly believe him to be.  And how many are ACORN-types interested only in downing the few true conservatives that gain any traction in these races.

 

Actually, I don't just wonder.  I'm convinced.  We need to rise up against this calculated, contrived menace, lest it put the final nail in our collective coffin.